UX Accessibility: Research and User Testing
Accessibility research taught through real user-testing practice: recruiting inclusively, running sessions, and turning findings into fixes.
In production — not yet publishedPluralsight (in production)
In production — not yet published. No publication date, platform listing, or published-course claim is made for this title.
Audience
Designers, researchers, and engineers who need to run accessible user-testing sessions and act on what they learn — not just cite accessibility guidelines.
Learning objectives — design intent
Phrased as design intent from the course topic. These are not presented as a publisher's official objective list.
- Design intent: plan an accessible research study, from participant contexts to session protocol.
- Design intent: run a user-testing session that does not exclude participants with disabilities.
- Design intent: analyse findings and turn them into concrete, prioritised product fixes.
- Design intent: seal a study with clear documentation and exportable evidence.
What was built
Production description: demos, labs, project files, and assessments as built for the course.
- Pre-recording QA completed 2026-10-21: Figma design passed 28/28 checkpoints, ready for recording.
- Demo structure prepared across four demos, with recording guides and per-demo Figma files.
- Production approach: design-primary recording, with a companion app used only for sealing and exports.
- This course is IN PRODUCTION. It is not published on Pluralsight, and no Pluralsight publication date is claimed here.
QA actually performed
- Pre-recording QA report, 2026-10-21: Figma Design 28/28 READY.
- Continuity gate passed under a design-primary recording plan.
- Demo structure only is described here; no published-course claim is made.
Checkpoint: accessflow_qa/ — pre-recording QA complete 2026-10-21; Figma design 28/28 ready.